Blooming Stars - Swami Dr. Snehanand Jyoti
(Autocracy, Rituals, and Spirituality
– 2)Before broaching
autocracy, a few observations on democracy are in order. Democracy with all its
draw-backs is still the best form of government that there is, and that alone
can help human spirit flourish. A human is programmed by one’s creator or nature
to achieve one’s full potentials or whatever is possible in this world.
Democracy is the government of the people by the people for all the people to
actualize one’s potentials. That is the main reason that I live in and root for
the oldest democracy, the USA, and the largest democracy, India. Both countries
have their serious draw-backs. Both countries do not have an enlightened
democracy that work for the largest common good, and that protect the interests
of the vast majority. The United States indulge in unbridled capitalism at the
expense of the poor and the middle class people.
The gap between the rich
and the poor is ever widening. There is a law pertaining to the minimum wage.
But there is no maximum wage law that ought to be put in place. There needs to
be a cap on the wealth that an individual can acquire as any wealth is
accumulated on the back of hard-working
people of a society that needs to protect everyone’s interests. The recent
fund-raising dinner of the Republican candidate for the 2012 presidential
election in November charged $50,000 (about 27 lakhs) per plate for food.
During the dinner speech the candidate stated that 47% of Americans are in some
form of government hand-out. Incidentally the candidate did not intend this
information for public consumption. The information taped and smuggled caught
the candidate unawares. What about transparency in a democracy? The 47% of
Americans that he talks about, I would dare say, make more financial sacrifice
for the country than the candidate himself. Even though the candidate made
millions of dollars in investment, he paid proportionately less tax than myself
in the past tax year. The society in which he and I live gives him a very large
hand-out because of the unfair tax laws orchestrated by an earlier president of
his own party. The very rich, I must say, are on corporate welfare.
Each person in the United
States, the seventh richest country in the world with a population of 314.447
million (31.4447 crores) people has a GDP (Gross Domestic Product) per capita
of $46860; that is, the purchasing parity for each person is $46860; the entire
GDP of the USA is $314, 447,000 X 46860. The first six richest countries have
only a population that ranges from 393,162 (Brunei) to 8,264,070 (United Arab Emirates)
persons. We need to put the $50000 dinner per person in the context of each
person worth $46860. Interestingly I was
disappointed by an Indian American conservative political commentator, who
discredits the current president through a movie entitled “2016: Obama’s
America”. He, a product of the
Jesuit-run St. Stanislaus High School, Bandra, (Mumbai, India), does no credit
to Indian Americans like myself.I do not think he had
imbibed sufficiently the social justice values the Jesuits were known to die
for. He may become very rich through
his movie by catering to the Republican party at a very crucial election time.
But he needs to remind himself that he and other Indians like myself got a
chance in the USA through generous policies of Democrats who also historically
provided the safety nets for the needy and the materially deprived. I am willing to grant that the entire
government aid and welfare system need to be cleaned and revamped. Now that most Indians have become rich they
seem to want to keep the wealth for themselves forgetting their own background.
I am reminded of the days of long ago when I used to travel in India by trains.
People who got in the train first bolted the doors of the coach from inside
denying entry to passengers from stations further down so the coach will not be
uncomfortably crowded. United States is a melting-pot of immigrants. All except
the natives came from other countries looking for opportunities. While I do not
by any means advocate overcrowding of the US, those who came earlier need not
close the borders for others if they can be accommodated without undue
inconvenience. In a pluralistic society voting on a one-issue basis could be
self-destructive. While I am against abortion, no Democratic or Republican president
is going to reverse the Supreme Court ruling on abortion until the country is
ready for it. While I cannot fathom the depth of moral degradation the four US
soldiers recently descended into by urinating on the dead bodies of Taliban
fighters after they were shot, this incident would have come to light only in a
free democratic society. I am sure they will be duly punished. The lobbyists
and money bags are exerting undue influence in Washington destroying democratic
principles. That an enormous amount of money needs to be raised to win an
election also adversely affects US democracy. (To be continued).
To read s articles: Click here
No comments:
Post a Comment