When I was
the commissioner of Lucknow, a retired civil servant came to meet me in my
office. I didn’t know him closely and had only heard his name but he felt close
to me. He had a personal problem and wanted me to solve it with the help of my
official position. The problem was his only son who was married and was living
in the same house, on the first floor. The son had been brought up with lots of
love and was married in due course. The daughter-in-law was also to their
liking, at least in the initial years of marriage.
The son was
not very sound financially but his wife also being a working woman, they were
somehow managing by themselves. To begin with, the family was living together
with a common kitchen but gradually the kitchen had to be separated and the son
shifted to the first floor. The house was owned by the father. In due course,
even living as neighbours became difficult and things reached to such a pass
that the father wanted his son to vacate the house. The son was not willing to
do so, mainly because of financial reasons, and this had become a bone of
contention between the father and the son. The
father had come to me to get his house vacated. I listened to his problem
patiently without intervening, till he finished. As soon as he completed, I
asked him whether he had come to me thinking of me as a commissioner or as a
well-wisher. I also told him that as a commissioner, I was not in a position to
help him because it was his personal problem, but I could certainly be of help
as a person provided he desired so. Being a good person, he could understand my
point and agreed to listen to my personal advice.
Then I told
him that the problem was not with his son but with himself. His attachment,
expectations as well as his ego were the main cause of the issue. I also told
him that if at all separation from them was an answer to the problem, he should
vacate the house instead of asking his son to do so. He was listening to me
seriously, which encouraged me to advise further. I said that according to me,
separation was not the answer to the problem and in all probability it would
only aggravate it. The answer lied in shedding the ego and developing an
attitude of detachment in their relationship. For this, he should start
treating his son as his tenant whose help could be sought only in an emergency.
For this, even if a nominal rent was to be charged, there was no harm in doing
that also. After all, if his son vacated the house, he would have to search for
a tenant.
The elderly
gentleman took my advice seriously and without speaking much thanked me and
left the place. His body language conveyed that he was going to follow my
counsel and he actually did. He met me again after a few months and thanked me
profusely for having given him a very pragmatic advice. At that time, his wife
was also with him and she was very happy too. They both admitted that the major
fault was at their end and once they took care of that, the relationship
improved. Now they were living happily with their son as neighbours, and he,
like a tenant. Since then whenever we meet, he never forgets to mention this
episode.
Rakesh Mittal I A S
No comments:
Post a Comment