Smart Plus - Rakesh Mittal I A S
The incident relates to November 1978.
I was posted as the Additional District Magistrate (Development) of Meerut and
also the Chief Executive Officer of Zila Parishad. In that month a mela used to
be organised at Garh Mukteshwar on the occasion of Kartika Poornima, on the
banks of the Ganges. People came to the mela in large numbers with great
devotion. As CEO of the Zila Parishad, I was to look after the arrangements at
the mela. I planned everything meticulously and everything started off well. My
effort was to put the available resources to optimum use. Naturally, this
required some cuts in the expenditure incurred on the members of the mela
committee. At the same time, I decided to give some more facilities to the
staff, who had to work hard during the mela. I also observed that more
complaints came from the members themselves rather than the public who accepted
everything in the name of Ganga Maa. The nature of complaints from the members
was more personal than of public interest.
The mela committee used to meet
periodically in the evening under my chairmanship. At one such meeting, some
members complained about the cuts in the facilities provided for them. At first
I tried to explain the position but they were not prepared to listen. After
some time I lost my temper and told them that whatever I had done was in larger
interests. I also said that under such circumstances, it was not possible for
me to continue to remain at the mela site and that I would be leaving for the
district headquarters. I was really angry and did not listen to anybody. I
immediately went to my camp, where I dictated a wireless message for the
Collector and also booked a telephone call to him.
Fortunately, the call matured at once
and the Collector was also available. I explained the whole situation to him
and sought his permission to leave the mela site. Firstly, he tried to console
me saying that such happenings were the hazards of public administration. When
I persisted in my resolution, he became tough and asked me not to leave the
mela site. He said that if my objective was to fight against the negative
elements, it would be defeated by my leaving the site and that was exactly what
they wanted. In such a situation the positive elements would get disheartened
and the purpose of the vested interests would be served. The argument appeared
very convincing to meand my agitation had died down; I accepted the advice of
the Collector. Meanwhile, the positive elements in the Committee too came to me
and pleaded for not leaving the site. Taking all these factors into
consideration, I decided to stay back and thereafter there was no problem. The
administration of the mela went on very smoothly. We were not only able to
provide more facilities to the public but were also able to do so at a lesser
cost. Incidentally the budget of the mela ended in a surplus against all
previous records of deficit. Naturally it was appreciated by all and gave me a
lot of satisfaction as well as confidence.
The morale of the incident is obvious.
We all come across situations in life when we feel that positive elements are
being harassed by negative elements. Quite often positive elements tend to quit
and leave the field free for negative elements. This is what negative elements want.
They know that they can never conquer the positive elements in a fair battle
and want to win by default. At times positive elements may not be prepared to
fight but in that case they should make preparation and not give up the idea of
fighting. Ultimately, the triumph is always of the positive elements. In this
battle the numbers are not very important. In the Mahabharata war five Pandavas
were stronger than one hundred and one Kauravas. Here it is a question of moral
strength which is missing in the negative elements. Normally, the negative
elements flee once they find the positive elements ready to fight. Even if they are able to muster the support
of other negative elements, they are internally weak. The battle should never
be lost to them by giving them a walk-over.
This is what my Collector meant when
he asked me to stay back. His exact
words were “Why should you quit?” I feel these are applicable to all positive
elements in all situations. The only exception can be a tactical retreat. After
all, at time, battles are lost to win a war and games are lost to win a match.
Read more stories from Smart Plus - Click here